MR Pilot Training vs Physical Pilot Training: A Comparison

Piloting a plane is a high-stress job that requires split-second judgments and quick reactions. As a result, pilots are trained extensively before they are given the responsibility of flying commercial planes or military aircraft. In recent years, the use of mixed reality technology has been suggested to improve pilot training. But how does MR pilot training compare to traditional physical pilot training?

In this blog post, we will compare the features, costs, and effectiveness of MR pilot training versus physical pilot training.

Features

Physical pilot training takes place in a real-world environment, usually with real planes. Trainees are taught how to operate the instruments and how to make decisions based on weather conditions, air traffic control, and other factors that may affect the flight. In contrast, MR pilot training utilizes virtual reality headsets and other technology to simulate the flying experience. Trainees can practice in a variety of simulated scenarios, such as different weather conditions and emergency situations.

Costs

Physical pilot training is expensive. Training a commercial pilot in the United States can cost upwards of $70,000; however, the cost of training a military pilot is much higher. This cost includes the use of real planes, fuel, insurance, and other operational costs. In contrast, MR pilot training is much cheaper and can be done without the need for physical planes or fuel. MR pilot training platforms can be bought or leased for a fraction of the cost of traditional pilot training.

Effectiveness

The effectiveness of pilot training is crucial. Inaccurate training can result in situations where pilots make the wrong decisions, leading to accidents and fatalities. Studies have shown that MR pilot training can improve the skills of pilots in various ways. For example, a study conducted by the University of California, Berkeley, found that MR pilot training improved trainee's situational awareness and decision-making abilities. However, other studies, such as one conducted by the University of Illinois, have shown that physical pilot training is still more effective in certain areas, such as the development of motor skills.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both MR pilot training and physical pilot training have their pros and cons. MR pilot training is cheaper and can provide a realistic simulation of the flying experience, but it may not be as effective in developing certain motor skills. Physical pilot training is more expensive, but it provides a more realistic training environment and may be more effective in developing certain motor skills. Ultimately, the choice of which method to use depends on a variety of factors, such as the trainee’s current skill level, the resources available, and the desired outcome.

References:

1. "Virtual Reality-Based Training for Aviation Emergency Management: The Effects on Cognitive Skills Acquisition and Retention." Nada M. Alkhaldi and Amal A. Banafa. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2019.

2. "Distributed acquisition of team competence through immersive mixed reality training." R. Sottilare, T. Holden, P. Fogleman, and M. Brawner. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2017.

3. "Optimal Monetary Incentives for Pilot Training." E. A. Lerner and J. R. McLean. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2012.